Showing posts with label critical_care. Show all posts
Showing posts with label critical_care. Show all posts

Thursday, September 16, 2010

Candida Score (CS) for discriminating between candida colonisation and invasive candiasis (non neutropenic patients)

Leon.C et al. Crit Care Med 2009; 37: 1624-1633

A prospective multi-centre study assessing the usefulness of CS for discriminating between candida spp. colonisation versus invasive candidiasis (IC) in non neutropenic and critically ill patients, enrolled 1107 patients admitted for at least 7 days. 
Fungal diagnosis was confirmed based on cultures, serum 1-3-beta-D-glucan adn anti-candida antibodies (some patients). 

Score: (0 = absent, 1 = present)
TPN 1
Surgery 1
Multifocal colonisation 1
Severe sepsis 2

CS >3 is at increased risk of IC (8.5%); with sensitivity 77.6% and specificity 66.2%, Positive predictive value 13.8%, and negative predictive value 97.7%. 
Early antifungal therapy may be considered. 

Risks of higher scores: 4 (16.8%); 5 (23.6%). 
Risk is 2.3% only, if score <3 and author concludes that IC is highly improbable in such patients.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19325481

Ventilator management for hypoxemic respiratory failure attributable to H1N1 novel swine origin influenza virus

Ramsey.C.D. et al. Critical Care Medicine 2010: 38

This article looks into patients who develop severe respiratory failure from pandemic Novel H1N1 influenza needing mechanical ventilation.

Mechanical ventilation using lung-protective strategy and previous trials including the ARMA trial/ ARDS Network protocol, were reviewed here: with low tidal volumes (Vt 6ml/kg), plateau pressures (<30 - 35cm H2O), and optimal PEEP aiming SpO2 88-90%.  However, trials are lacking in H1N1 patient groups and the author comments that physician preference on ventilator settings vary.

In some patients with severe persistent hypoxaemia (SpO2 <88-90% with high PEEP and FIO2>0.8), alternative methods of ventilation are discussed, such as high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV), airway pressure release ventilation, and prone positioning, are reviewed.  At present, data of each of these methods are still very limited thus choice depends on perceived benefit v.s. risks.

The author discouraged the use of NIV, as it was not successful in the majority of severe hypoxia from H1N1 and majority of patients still required mechanical ventilation eventually.  There has been concerns that NIV can increase the risks of H1N1 transmission by generating more aerosol.  It "may be considered for patients with milder disease whose anticipated need for ventilatory support is short".  The author explained the reason for poor results of NIV in critically ill patients may be due to greater proportion of type 1 than type 2 respiratory failure, as NIV demonstrated more consistent benefit in avoiding intubation among patients with hypercapnic as opposed to hypoxaemic respiratory failure (e.g. CCF, COPD exacerbations, pulmonary edema, and immunocompromised).

http://journals.lww.com/ccmjournal/Fulltext/2010/04001/Ventilator_management_for_hypoxemic_respiratory.8.aspx

Tuesday, April 15, 2008

Reading - Pulmonary Hypertension in Critical Care

Last week's reading was on pulmonary hypertension.
( Roham TZ et al. Managing strategies for patient with pulmonary hyertension in the ICU. Critical Care Medicine 2008)
This paper highlights that pulmonary hypertension and concomitant right ventricular failure present a particularly difficult diagnostic and therapeutic challenge in haemodynamically unstable patients in the ICU.

The categories of underlying aetiology can be sub-divided into those that causes:
1) pulmonary arterial hypertension;
2) associated with significant venous or capillary disease;
3) secondary to left heart disease;
4) Due to lung disease or hypoxaemia
5) due to thrombotic / embolic diseases

There are few important learning messages from this paper:
1) Fluid resuscitation must be carefully initiated because intravascular depletion (hence low pre-load) or over-load can worsen haemodynamics.
2) Mechanical ventilation - especially at high tidal volume and high PEEP can worsen pulmonary hypertension and hence haemodynamics (Target PEEP 5 - 8).
3) Effective treatment relies on ability to accurately identify the underlying cause - from history, thorough examination, and appropriate investigations (ECHO; the gold-standard cardiac catheterisatio; ECG, CXR etc) and address the primary cause.
4) Although studies of inotropes and vasodilators in pulmonary hypertension (especially in ICU) are limited, the use of dobutamine, inhaled nitric oxide, and IV prostacycline have the greatest support in the literature). As for other treatments, relies on good understanding of their pharmacokinetics / dynamics and co-morbidities of the patient being treated.
5) The use of vasopressors should be carefully titrated to their lowest effective dose due to higher risk of side-effects without extra treatment benefits. Such important side-effects include tachycardia, increasing cardiac oxygen demand, profound hypotension, and arrhythmias.

Monday, April 7, 2008

Best wishes for JM's trip to Delhi for his MRCS exams!


He will be leaving from 14 - 21 Apr for his exams, please wish him best of luck!


Please take this moment to read up a few things about Delhi:
1. Malarial prophylaxis
2. FCO information for travelers (India)
3. About Delhi (Lonely Planet)
4. CDC's traveler's health (India)

Interesting readings for next week (Theme: Critical care medicine)
Pulsus Paradoxus (Plus how to measure properly!!)
Management of pulmonary hypertension in critical care
Management of delirium in the ICU and a good quick summary sheet published by its authors
which highlights the diagnosis of delirium requiers
1) acute onset of fluctuating altered mental status &
2) inattention
PLUS
3) disorganised thinking OR 4) Altered level of consciousness.

Homework: please summarise the KEY points each topic to no more than 1 A4 sheet, or 7 minutes short presentation.